The Quadrantid meteor shower is the first major shower of the new year. More importantly the shower is a strong and reliable performer. It also happens to be one of the least observed stream of the major showers as early January usually produces low overcasting clouds whether you live in Asia, Europe or North America.
Unlike visual and video observers the low clouds and snow are no problem for radio observers. As the Quadrantid shower echo rates started increasing in West Kelowna, I started watching the live radio page at the RMOB site. I also visited the Japanese sites as well.
By observing these sites I could watch as the echo counts decreased in Europe as the radiant dipped downward, my numbers were on the increase. As mine were peaking the Japanese started seeing the radiant. As my data was taking hits from long duration, overdense echoes I made a note to see if I could make sense of the Quadrantid shower over both geographical space and through time.
I submitted my the results of my analysis to the editor of the WGN, the Journal of the International Meteor Organization. After being reviewed by others it was published. You can download a copy of the paper here.
The Sentinel II was earliest of the Sentinel camera system used by the BCMN. It used a convex mirror with the camera above the reflecting mirror. Video was feed into a VCR. Users then scanned the nights catch the next day or when there was a report of a fireball.
Sentinel III
This system is still in use by many of the operators of the BCMN. The camera and associated hardware can be seen in a picture essay here Sentinel III system in photos. The system uses an external frame grabber which has firmware burned into a EPROM chip. The frame grabber has an IP address of 10.0.0.1 and communicates with the host computer via a Null type ethernet cable.
Pros:
The software runs on very old, less capable computers without straining them.
The software can run multiple platforms/systems as is.
Software is written in a clear logical way and can be modified easily.
Stable and will run for months at a time.
Cons:
The external frame grabber takes time to download the capture to the software so some meteors are missed during this transaction.
Frame grabber ties up an Ethernet port
On some routers it is impossible to run a net time server due to the 10.0.0.# addressing or port loss.
No stacking of images to bring out the stars. The make long exposure after event helps but is not that powerful.
Shelf space taken up by external frame grabber, cable, and power supply cords.
Sentinel IV
Is the next generation in the Sentinel line. This system employs an internal video card; the Hauppauge ImpactVCB model 188 board.
The software is in beta testing so it is hard to list the pros and the cons. Many of the cons have been squashed in the last couple of upgrades. When fully developed the software is suppose to automatically ftp the events back to New Mexico where it will be analyzed. This feature has not been implemented as of yet.
Pros:
The biggest improvement is the near real time capture and data writing. There are no longer dead seconds (sometimes minutes) while the card downloads to the computer. This leads to much less loss of data during showers. It does have a method to simulate stacking frames that helps define dimmer stars.
I see two cons so far. The first is the software’s dependence on Windows system software. I can not be run on Linux or Mac computers without going to a virtual machine and running Windows. I see this as a big step backwards although Window users will not be that impacted by the switch. The other con is the code is compiled so there is no way to easily read or modify the source code.
It is too soon to tell how stable the final version of the software will be or what planned features will make the final cut.
Unlike Sentinel software UFOCaptureV2 (V2.22 2008/11/28) is not freeware, it is a commercial product. There are two other sets of software that analyze the UFOCapture files, UFOAnalyzer V2 (V2.28 2010/02/28) and UFO Oribit (V2.25 2010/02/28). They both are freeware and they will be covered in the Video Analysis section.
Pros:
Works with multiple camera types.
Highly flexible can fine tune to observer’s needs.
Overlays a Time stamps on the video images.
Easy to make masking
Software notes and produces scintillation masks.
Can fine tune the triggering and greatly reduce or eliminate aircraft, spiders, and bird triggers.
Records more stars than Sentinel does during exposures.
Multiple meteor capture possible
Coupled with the two associate analysis software the trio gives the user a very powerful tool, especially with multi-station captures.
Cons:
Needs a video to digital card like Canopus or the Hauppauge card that comes with Sentinel IV.
Expensive license versus freeware and shareware.
The manual was originally written in Japanese and the English translation is fairly choppy and hard to understand at times.
Eats up a lot cpu cycles so a newer, faster and more capable computer is needed compared to a Sentinel system
The software is so full of features it presents a steep learning curve before feeling at ease with it.
One of the biggest problem with forward scatter data is that each recording station is different from the others. One station might be using a highly directional yagi type antenna with it’s associated forward gain, while others might be using a simple vertical antenna. Others stations use a one wavelength closed loop, discones, or even quadafilar antennas. Each type of antenna places a certain bias on how many echoes are heard per hour.
In addition to the various antennas in use, radio observers also employ many different types of receivers. Some are state of the art while others are less sensitive and less selective than the more capable receivers. This again will influence the station’s daily data.
Yet an other variable among the stations it their frequency and transmitter choice. A few Japanese station listen to beacons on 28 MHz while several Europeans listen to the French satellite radar at 143. Frequency choice and the transmitter’s output power can greatly affect a station’s data.
Recognizing this inter-station variability a few of us decided to attempt a numerical model to ‘level the playing field’ by using the concept of Observability Function. There will be follow ups to improve this initial modeling. It has been field tested and provides some hope on equalizing the data from such diverse stations.
The complete paper (WGN 34:3 p87-97) can be downloaded here.
The best and most reliable meteor shower of the year are the Geminids at 120 meteors per hour on early Monday December 14. The second best are the Quadrantids at 120/hr on January 4 but these last only for a few hours. The Perseids are better known, since they occur on August 13 when it’s nice and warm out. But they’re actually number three on the list at 100 meteors per hour.
Since the new Moon occurs on Dec 11, the sky will be dark so we should see even the fainter meteors. The peak should occur around 10am in the morning, Dec 14, persisting for 24 hours. But 2am is fine when the shower’s radiant point, Gemini, rises high in the sky to the East. The meteors are the sand, dust and gravel remains of an Apollo asteroid (3200 Phaethon), coming in at medium speeds of 35km/second. (That’s a medium speed for a meteor. Other meteor shower velocities range from 11 to 72 km/s.) The Geminids come in various colours–65% being white, 26% yellow, and the remaining 9% blue, red and green. They’re active from Dec 4 until Thursday Dec 17. Last night I saw a bright yellow tinted fireball zip across Orion crossing a quarter of the Southern sky, leaving a shorter glowing trail along the last third of it’s flight; and another fireball went across Taurus just two minutes later. Last night I saw a bright yellow tinted fireball zip across Orion crossing a quarter of the Southern sky, leaving a shorter glowing trail along the last third of it’s flight; and another fireball went across Taurus just two minutes later.
Which direction is best to look? Where it’s darkest. As you can see in these composite photos from last year, the fireballs scatter all over the sky, radiating out from Gemini to the East. But when you watch the area around Gemini, the streaks there are shorter and slower moving. These fisheye photos show the whole sky as a circle: North is up, South down, East to the left, and West to right. Geminids during the night of 15 Dec 2014 These photos were taken from Cranbrook, BC with the College of the Rockies meteor cam. Geminid Meteors Towards North and Big Dipper
Below is a starmap looking East around 11pm on Dec 14. Note Gemini the Twins rising due East, just left of Orion the Hunter. Look for two bright stars, Castor over top of the other, Pollux. Gemini the Twins used to be a benevolent guide for the ancient Sailers. In movies you sometimes hear old sailors exclaim “By Jiminy!”. Sirius is the very bright star along the SouthEastern horizon below Orion. Taurus the Bull is the “>” shape above Orion, with the red eye of Aldebaran. The Pleiades are a small fuzzy patch above that.
Starmap for 14 Dec 2015 Looking East
These pictures are pixelated to fit in this small window–right click and open image in a new tab to zoom in more.
One of the best meteor showers during the year are the Geminids, which occur annually on Dec 14. Earth enters the fringes of their orbit from Dec 4 until Dec 17. The peak of 120 meteors per hour, should be from Saturday noon Dec 13, until Sunday morning 10am Dec 14, 2014.
The skies were dark, since the Moon didn’t rise until after midnight. Although both nights it got cloudy around 1am where I am near Cranbrook, BC. The meteors were generally bright, medium fast speeds of 35km/s, and different colours. I saw white and red. This shower has some mass sorting, with small dust arriving the first day, followed by grains of sand, then pebbles a day later. It’s debris from a 5km diameter asteroid, 3200 Pheathon.
Dec 16 is also the peak for a smaller meteor shower, the Coma Berenicids, with a peak of 3 meteors per hour.
I took three Nikon cameras out. I goofed on one camera, I had it set for just ISO 1000. That captured two meteors in Ursa Minor, and that’s why they were so dim. The other two cameras were set at 3200 ISO, which is optimum. The max is 6400, but that can be snowy. The slight background brown glow is woodsmoke and thin cloud, the camera sensor shows haze like that. This was a Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 lens, hooded against the frost. All the tripods and camera equipment quickly frosted over at the -7 deg temperatures.
I was out again Sunday evening by Horseshoe Lake, with clouds over Orion. I got a hundred more photos and listened to coyotes howling nearby. The meteors were pretty nice still, I saw one every minute, some just out of the corners of my eye. Most were white falling parallel to the northern and southern horizon. Two I saw were moving slow, red in colour, on the far Western horizon.
The AllSky Meteor Cam at the College of the Rockies in Cranbrook BC
This is the College All-sky meteor cam showing the eleven brightest Dec 15 meteors stacked on one frame, from 7pm until 2am when it clouded over. North at top of photo and East to the left. Two bright fireballs on the horizon! That trail of dots there is Jupiter rising. Some clumps of dots are just aircraft strobes.
And here’s the 11 meteor stack for Dec 14 from 9pm until 1:15am, when it clouded over. About the same each evening.
And just for fun, here’s all the photos stacked from the camera watching Ursa Minor over a 43 minute period, taken with 30 second exposures, 28mm f/2.5 lens, 1000 ISO.
Geminids from Invermere
This photo was taken facing South, showing Orion before the Moon rose, from Invermere by Robert Ede. He says: I saw some beauties. A few with smoke trails.
On December 22, 2006 The Ursid shower showed an above normal peak as reported by visual observers, all-sky video observers, and by radio observers. The outburst was predicted in CBET 77. The West Kelowna camera was under an overcast and did not record any captures. The radio data however did record earth passing through the predicted Ursid filament.
Here is the original telegram announcing our findings:
The smoke and haze in Southeastern BC was a problem, but the Allsky Meteor Cam on the Cranbrook College of the Rockies roof still got a dozen bright Perseids or so on the 12-13th. Not 52 like Jeff Brower got on his AllSky meteor cam in Kelowna, by a long shot. This year was a bit better than 2013, although not as many bright fireballs. Below are the brightest ten meteors of the night, all shown on one frame, on the fisheye all-sky view.
I ended up going to the top of nearby Mt. Baker to get above the smoke. South of Cranbrook, just 26km on my tripmeter on a gravel logging road with lots of switchbacks, ending at some radio towers at 7,200 ft altitude. Even up there the horizons were shrouded in haze, and you could see blue haze in the headlights. I couldn’t see Sagittarius at all, no stars were visible below Aquilla. The dim red beacon lights on the radio tower tops weren’t too bright by the picnic table, so that’s where I ended up. I was the only person there, quiet and cool, about 11 deg C. Crickets singing, owls hooting and coyotes howling way off in the distance, motors and fans cutting on and off from the antennaes. Maybe a bat winged over. There are dozens of satellite dishes and radio towers around the hill crest there.
Mount Baker Radio Tower Site
I setup three Nikons and a colour video cam. Left them autoclicking for an hour until the main batteries died, then another hour until the spares died.
Perseid Meteor streaking through Cygnus Shot of a Perseid meteor streaking through Cygnus the Swan. Deneb is the bright blue-white star above.
Overhead the stars were clear and the sky dark with the Milky Way band glowing. Perseus, Pegasus and Auriga to the East over the Steeples were bright. It was great! The meteors were coming down left and right every fifteen seconds! Some bright ones leaving a glowing line that slowly faded. Mostly white, but some green tinged. Some sporatics that didn’t radiate from Perseus.
Short Green Meteor Trails in Perseus
That zigzag constellation above is Perseus, with two tiny green meteor streaks radiating from there, red at the ends. There is a fainter third meteor.
Sporatic Meteor through Cygnus
Above is a photo of a sporatic going through Cygnus the Swan. Deneb the tail at top, Alberio the beak at bottom. Milky way glow. Shots of Andromeda got nothing except the Andromeda galaxy.
I took these photos with a bunch of Nikon D100 DSLR cameras with Tamron 28mm f/2.5 lenses, and a Vivitar 28mm f/2.0 lens. Exposure times were 30 seconds at 3200 ISO using sunlight white balance. I found I needed at least a f/2.8 lens, since when I used a f/3.3 lens a fairly bright meteor only appeared as a faint streak across the photo.
The Internation Meteor Organization is having their 2015 Conference in Mistelbach, Austria. from August 27 (Thursday evening) until August 30. At that meeting, Bill Ward from Glascow, UK will be presenting this following paper on Video Spectroscopy. He writes:
One of the new observing programmes I’m working on is called “Towards a New Meteor Taxonomy” (under review). For the first time, as video spectroscopy has become so efficient (you’ll see on the poster I got over a hundred last year alone!) that large samples are now a viable prospect.
Shower meteors, by definition, should have similar properties but are there larger “families” within the sporadic population? I think I’ve taken the first step towards realizing this. I’ve found three spectra with almost identical properties. One from 2006 and two from this year.
Take a look at this: Fireball Spectra Discussion between Bill Ward, Martin Dubs, and Koji Maeda. About half way down are the three graphs.
Martin Dubs Meteor SpectraKoji Maeda”s Spectrum with Approx Element IDs
If this doesn’t persuade people that we’re into a new era of meteor observing I don’t know what will!!!
Video Meteor Spectroscopy Kilwinning Spectroscopic Survey for Meteors International Meteor Conference. Mistelbach, Austria. 27th-30th August 2015.
The KiSSMe project is an ongoing program to secure video meteor spectra on a routine basis year round. In the long term this may identify if there are any discernible compositional groupings amongst sporadic meteors/fireballs.
Currently three WATEC cameras are in use for spectroscopy (2 x 902H2 Ultimate and 1 x 910HX/RC). Each carries a 12mm f0.8 lens fitted with a 600 groove/mm transmission grating. The dispersion of this configuration is approximately 1.2nm/pixel. A further two WATEC cameras are used for general observing (1 x 902H2 Ultimate and 1 x 910HX/RC). Each is fitted with a 3.5 – 8mm f1 lens. Tests are currently underway with a QHY5II-M USB video camera to try and obtain HD images/spectra.
QuadrantidMeteorSpectra_BillWardPoster
From April 2014 to April 2015, 105 video meteor spectra were captured in 714 hours of observing. Examples of spectra generated by bright meteors are shown here.
Taurid Fireball Spectra from Poster
Working with members of the Network for Meteor Triangulation and Orbit Determination (NEMETODE) (1), simultaneous spectroscopic and orbit determination observations have been undertaken. This has resulted in the first such combined observation made from the UK.
The spectrum shows strong emission from magnesium, sodium, oxygen and iron. The meteor was determined to have had an orbital aphelion within the asteroid belt.
On June 18 Peter Spaans and I visited the site where the Canal Flats fireball hit, on the Middle White River. Here are some photos of the terrain there. For a closer look, right click on the photo and open it in a new tab
[Map_FireballArea_sm2.jpg] Map showing closeup of the strewn field ellipse. The centre of ellipse marked at “C”. We parked at “P” at a creek at 4.6km.
“Strewn Field” Distribution: Dr. Hildebrand assumes the meteor fragments are scattered in this elliptical area 3km wide by 5 km long, on a logged hillside on the Middle White River. Anything that hit on the East side of the river, would be on a narrow shelf of flat rock, with high rocky cliffs above and bluffs below. The heavier “three pieces” would likely travel to the far end of the ellipse across the river, with 1 and 2kg fragments near the centre, and lighter fragments not travelling as far, scattered along the Western edge.
Russell Ridge Wide View
Russell Ridge: [RussellPanMidBluff1_1537-38-39.JPG] photo of the Western Ridge from half way up the East river bluffs, looking Northwest towards Sinna Creek where it cuts through the notch in Russell Ridge and enters the Middle White River. Note all the dead trees from the forest fire of 2003. The meteor would have smoked in just over the ridge, hitting like shotgun pellets all along Sinna Creek and these bluffs; smacking into ten foot deep snow banks at a terminal velocity of about 200 to 300 km/h. (Initial velocity when it entered the atmosphere was slow for a meteor, around 15km/s, the average fireball enters at 20km/s. For comparison, the space station orbits at 8km/s).
Bluffs seen from river trail through trees
[BluffsWhiteREast_1534sm.JPG] Looking East to the Lancaster Bluffs along the river, from a spot on the old horse trail beside the river. This is where the bigger chunks of meteorite would have hit.
Bigger view of Lancaster Bluffs on the East, with Marconi Peak hidden behind them, from up on Russell ridge where we parked. [PanBluffsE28mm_1526-27-28.JPG] Wide view of the Lancaster East Bluffs
It’s pretty tangled at the meteor site. There are dead trees blown over from an old forest fire, and a dense crowd of 6 foot tall pine trees newly growing, and a river and four creeks running through it. But a little bit of paradise to hike in, once you’re down on an old horse trail paralleling the river. We gave up on the higher logging areas because of the crowds of small pine trees, and went down to the open river bluffs at the front third of the impact “ellipse” at 5,050 ft. More likelihood there of finding big chunks, and it’s not clogged with close-packed pine trees. The road to the Maiyuk Rec Site at 68km is washed out just before the Mid White bridge, so we crossed the river here over a fallen log.
Crossing a Log across the Middle White R
[LogBridgePete_1536sm.jpg] That’s Peter Spaans crossing the log in the photo. Pete used to work as lab instructor in the Physics Lab at the College back in the 1990s. I found about eight odd looking black rocks but none were attracted to a magnet. And found tasty red strawberries, elk tracks, bear scat. No mosquitoes. The trip was worth it just for the mountain scenery there. Solid limestone mountains rising with sheer slabs of snow tipped peaks. Birds singing, elk, deer, rabbits, porcupines and other wildlife.
Note that there’s a fellow working there for CanFor with a mulcher with caterpillar tracks, cutting four foot wide swathes into the densely planted pine trees for spacing purposes.
GETTING THERE:
Middle Fork Rec Site: Via main road, go to White Swan Lake, which is by Canal Flats, BC (near Invermere BC in the Rocky Mountain Range of the East Kootenay’s.). Follow the gravel logging road to the Middle Fork Rec Site just past Seeta Creek at KM66 on the White Middle fork of the White River Forest Service Road. There was a forest fire there in 2003, and it has been logged since, but the Middle Fork trail was cleared in Aug 2014. At 67km leave the main road and turn left on the Sinna Creek logging road 0.9 km past the Seeta Creek bridge. From there, go 3.1km to reach the edge of the ellipse. The centre of ellipse marked on the map as “C”. We parked at “P” at a creek at 4.6km; crossed it and walked down the next dry creek bed to the Lancaster bluffs.
Our Destination Ahead from KM60
View from 60km looking North, our destination in sight. [Pan_RussellJoffreMarconi_60km.jpg] That teepee mountain on the centre left is Russell Peak. Snow and glacier covered Mt. Joffre and Mt. Nivelle at centre, and Mt. Marconi at right centre, behind Lancaster bluffs.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR: Carbonaceous Chondrites: comprise only about 2 percent of meteorites known to have fallen to Earth, are typically difficult to recover because they easily break down during entry into Earth’s atmosphere and during weathering on the ground. Look for black or dark grey rocks that a magnet will stick to. The surface may have a thin grayish fusion crust (a thin melted layer one or two millimetres thick) and scattered thumb sized hollows (worn away by atmospheric friction ablation, called regmaglypts). Although some rarer meteorites like the Tagish Lake meteorite looked like charcoal briquettes.
Ignore layered sedimentary rocks (shale, limestone, dolomite) since these require an ocean to form, and this wouldn’t be found on an asteroid in outer space. Also, if it has holes or bubbles inside (like pumice) that was likely from lava flows (basalt-magma) cooled with trapped volcanic gases, on Earth (although there are rare exceptions: a large asteroid like Vesta had volcanoes). Also, ignore rocks containing quartz or calcite, since they form in high pressure, hot watery solutions.
Magnets: Since a lot of carbonaceous chondrite types (CH, CI, CM, CB) contain iron oxides like magnetite, and some metal rich ones contain nickel-iron chondrules, a rare-earth magnet should stick to most. Dr. Hildebrand says: “Even the hydrated carbonaceous chondrite meteorites would stick to a magnet; something like a CV4 like Allende has the least ferro magnetic phases and might not stick, but that lithology looks v. much like meteorites and I would have guessed that this rock was weaker than CV (not that I really know). Only thing to add would be to keep an eye out for a pile of debris rather than just a solid stone – the hydrated lithologies would probably have started to break up by now.”
Three types of carbonaceous chondrites
Photo: from Wikipedia showing some carbonaceous chondrites. From left to right: type CV4: Allende, C2: Tagish Lake (in sample bag on white paper) and CM: Murchison. Chondrite means that inside the rock are silicate chunks ranging in size from 0.3mm to 10mm, surrounded by a fine-grain black rock matrix. The chunks are usually olivine (a magnesium iron silicate common on Earth but quickly weathered) or the chunks can be nickel-iron metal. The black rock matrix is made of hydrous phyllosilicates similar to terrestrial clays, sulfides, and oxidized iron in the form of magnetite. Many contain high percentages (3% to 22%) of water, as well as organic compounds (like bitumen). However there are many types and they are complex and fairly challenging to describe, so for more detail, see: http://www.meteorite.fr/en/classification/carbonaceous.htm, and http://Wikipedia.org/wiki/carbonaceous_chondrite
Value: If a hiker finds a piece, it could be worth a lot of bucks per gram or it may be disappointing. Common iron meteors are only $.50/gram to $5/gram, rarer stony meteorites $2 to $20/gram, and really rare ones $100 or $1000/gram or more, depending if they have embedded gems or if they’re from Mars or the Moon. And some meteors are dense and heavy, so they go a long way. For example, back in 2000, the rare carbonaceous chondrite meteor that landed on frozen Tagish Lake on the B.C.-Yukon border brought Jim Brook, the lodge owner who found it an estimated $850,000. The University of Alberta, with Canada’s second-largest meteorite collection, bought most of the meteorite. For sample meteorite pricing, see http://www.meteorlab.com/METEORLAB2001dev/offering21o.htm The Washington University in St. Louis has a great webpage showing all sorts of meteorites at http://meteorites.wustl.edu/id/metal2.htm.
If you do find a possible meteorite, send a photo to Dr. Hildebrand at the University of Alberta in Calgary. Note that American Meteor hunters have to report to the Canadian Customs, Canada has export restrictions on them.
Meteorite ID Flow Chart
[meteorite_flow_chart.gif] Above is a flow chart guide designed by Deborah Guedes in Brazil to help identify a meteorite. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2010/pdf/5357.pdf “Regmaglypts” are those worn-away thumb sized hollows in the surface.
Rick Nowell Astronomy Lab Tech College of the Rockies Cranbrook, BC
The Eta Aquarid Meteor Shower should peak Monday night, the 5th of May at 07:00 Universal Time (or midnight Mountain Time, 11pm Pacific Time), but the best viewing times (due to the Moon and a low Eastern radiant) will a few hours before dawn Tuesday morning, around 4am to 5am.
At the peak, up to 55 meteors could be seen each hour.They’re pretty fast, at 66km/second, often bright with very long paths, and leave persistent glowing trails.
The source of the meteors is debris from Halley’s comet.The Comet’s orbital path contains dust particles and ice (thinned out in spots by Jupiter).The Earth crosses the orbital path of Halley’s Comet twice each year.In May we see it as the Eta Aquarid meteor shower and in October the Orionids.
The Eta Aquarids should be best seen early Tuesday morning. The Moon will have set by then, so it will be seen under a dark sky.The radiant is low in the Eastern sky, in Aquarius, which rises around 4am.So half the meteors will be unseen below the horizon.